Panopticism Michel Foucault, in his essay Panopticism, talks about how the across-the-boardon is a gimmick of index finger. But what I wonder is this: Is it the panopticon that holds the source or is it nevertheless the fear of being watched that re each(prenominal)y is holding the fountain? A panopticon was originally a prison that is constructed so that pris wholenessrs sack be seen at all times further the guards mess not. Foucault, however, discusses how the humor of panopticons are used at all levels of society, everything from schools, asylums, hospitals, and barracks all get under peerlesss skin panoptic similarities. Knowing this, one would have to believe that the power of such buildings isnt because of the people in load up of them but because of the panoptic theory. The lengthy distil from pp. 232-33 of Foucaults essay is a tough one to understand at first. It tries to say that the panopticon takes power away from a single person. It is not so much t he person that holds the power, but the mechanism itself that is powerful. The power of the person in charge is meaningless. The panopticon assures that everything get out be assorted that is in its reign. But it bequeath unclutter everything different for the better not the worse. It will be different because it will ca-ca people think before they do something wrong.
The buy food also tries to say that it doesnt matter who is in charge or has the power. whateverbody, any random person, can run the panopticon. Any visitant regardless of their motive would only help conciliate the panopticon much(pren ominal) powerful. The more random people yo! u have viewing, the greater the encounter for the inmate of being caught doing something wrong. This will only make him more aware of being observed. Then the excerpt tho goes on to say that... If you want to get a abounding essay, straddle it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment